| Keeping pace with emerging network threats is not a | | | | approach demands no matter what the volume of |
| big deal with Cyberoam's multi-core advantage. | | | | traffic is, nor the type of threat. |
| Nobody seems to question the capacity of Unified | | | | Stands to reason since attackers are targeting the |
| Threat Management appliances these days. Now that | | | | users. Users themselves are turning into a threat with |
| we have introduced multi-core processors, the | | | | more than half the threats coming from internal |
| question has become moot. | | | | sources. So now, Cyberoam continues to let you see |
| Multi-core processor driven Cyberoam UTM appliance | | | | each and every user with the username, anywhere in |
| isn't just about powerful hardware, but redesigned | | | | the network, anytime of the day or night- at vastly |
| software too, to take the greatest advantage of the | | | | higher speeds. |
| scalable multi-core architecture. With that, Cyberoam | | | | Plus, it continues to offer the highest levels of security |
| has raised the bar with 5-6 times higher throughput | | | | against emerging threats without degrading |
| even over IPS and UTM over HTTP - and we aren't | | | | performance since the updates are done on the |
| talking of just UDP throughput here. | | | | software and not the hardware - it's a known fact |
| This is one more reason why Cyberoam continues to | | | | that hardware eventually begins to show the strain on |
| offer the granularity that its security + identity | | | | its limited space and slows down your security. |