Protecting Against M&A, Layoff Vulnerabilities Tricky But Possible

I've covered this topic more than once since thenecessary for their jobs and who make more printouts
economy went from very bad to scary awful, but itthan usual. It is a good idea to keep an eye out for
bears much repeating: There is going to be a lot oftroubled employees who may be receptive to pitches
chaos during the next few months - layoffs andfrom crooks. The story also suggests appropriate
mergers - and security staffs need to pay a lot ofelectronic safeguards and, for good measure, ends
attention to keep data safe. Ideally, it is a good idea towith two or three more scary stories.
do this long before the layoffs or mergers start.In the cases of mergers and acquisitions, security
That's the message. Processor says that it isconcerns must be handled while the IT department is
important to track which assets each employee canbusy with a tremendous number of other things.
access. This is a bigger job than it seems and must beIndeed, security only is mentioned at the end of this
done in a systematic way before the employee is letpiece, which looks at some of the things that must be
go. Passwords to group or shared accounts must bedone by an IT staff going through the M&A
tracked. That's tricky, of course, because thoseprocess. The staffs must synchronize financial and
passwords are assigned to a group of people. Theyhuman resource data and merge the underlying IT
should be changed when an employee has been givensystems. The piece says that synchronizing the
notice or is told that he or she will be laid off days orfinancial data is the biggest issue. The last thing these
weeks before it actually happens. This lets thefolks have time to worry about is renegade current or
company track whether the person is trying to reachlaid off employees. So it's vital to have robust and
into areas in which he or she shouldn't tread.comprehensive policies and technical hardware and
The most effective way to guard passwords is tosoftware systems in place.
establish a structure to protect them while theThese threats exist today in big enterprises - and in
employee still is with the company. The piece isthe city of Clarksville, TN. The Leaf Chronicle reports
followed by sidebars that provide tips on preventingthat an external security audit there revealed that
insider attacks and a checklist for a departingemployees retained access after termination and that
employee.password standards were not adequate. The audit
A recent IDG piece in The New York Times beginslooked at the city in general, the gas and water
with a troubling vignette: A manager at Pilz left onedepartment and the energy department. It found that
company to work for a rival and took a lot of valuabledenial of access rights was not completed quickly
information with him. The only thing that saved hisenough at all three levels and recommended that the
original employer was the competitor's honesty. Thesystem be adjusted. The audit also found that
suggestions: Watch people who suddenly work longencryption was inadequate. Officials said that steps
hours, seek access to corporate information notwould be taken to rectify the situation.