Security Issues - Wireless Banking & Trading

It seems like the world is going wireless these days,more attractive targets for the criminally-minded as
including the banking and trading industries. Wirelesstheir gains are greater. Users have worries that
banking and trading is still in its infancy stage, and onepersonal identifying information - credit card account
must keep up with new products, new technologicalnumbers, identities, and other information - may be
breakthroughs, and developmental aids to help withstolen. Such fears are confirmed with statistics
transitions from the old to the new. Standards areindicating that more than ninety percent of corporate
changing for APIs (interfaces), gateways, securitydocumentation/financial files have been hacked. Data
methods, screens, operating systems, browsers,flows through wireless devices are vulnerable with
handheld devices, and different bandwidthmany systems offering little to no security with most
requirements. All these changes reveal risks tosecurity transgressions being carried out by
systems and consumers. Wireless banking and tradingemployees working within the institutions or even the
can be risky, lengthy, and complicated to develop andservice providers themselves.
use. Interfaces must be able to connect backendIndividual computing powers of handheld devices limit
systems already in place, and application servers havethe ability to customize security, and many facilities that
to accommodate all protocols and devices.handle financial transactions are using a two-step code
This is a must because manufacturers do not knowverification procedure as a means to protect and
which device users plan to use. This is true forverify accessibility. This means that the user must be
application servers - they must be able toable to enter the correct codes to gain system entry.
communicate with all gateways like WAP, GSM,These codes must agree in order to authorize any
two-way pagers, and other devices. Wirelesstransaction. It should be noted that the use of a
networks function independently, and many devices,two-step code verification procedure has shown a
especially handheld, utilize their own standards todrastic reduction in the number of hacking incidents
deliver data over data channels. Users personalize bysimply because of the requirement for personal
customizing screens, alerts, notifications, andknowledge of the same codes by the user, the
messaging devices easily. Systems should be capableservice provider, and the financial institution. Another
of sending notices to users as needed regardless ofwidely used system is the PK1 or Public Key
devices types and brands. Platform selection isInfrastructure utilized by many personal digital
important and challenging for banking institutions andassistants and other similar devices. This system
should not be done independently. Platforms shouldemploys the use of two keys - public and private - to
have the ability to integrate easily and reliably with newverify and decode data. The bank or other institution
gateways to the backend or existing system. Somethen uses the same system to prevent unauthorized
banking institutions outsource the development,system entry.
implementation, and hosting of their systems and someIt is more or less a question of what is better - speed
may choose to use a third party to implement andor security. Encryptions vary depending on the
host their system. All are viable options.platform used and the operating system with
Security is the most important issue facing financialencryption speeds varying according to software
institutions today. In an age of wireless communicationsselected. Another aid in security protection is the use
with millions of users, all systems - whether wireless orof user identifications and individualized unknown
cable - run the risk of hackers sometimes resulting inpasswords.
devastating losses. Wireless financial transactions are