Implementing Threats, Risk and Security Audits

People used to close business deals with a handshake.vulnerabilities are identified; solutions are proposed and
They looked one another in the eye. Today, more andrefined; corporate policies are tightened up; roles and
more transactions are electronic, anonymous and, inresponsibilities are assigned; standards and training are
too many cases, fraudulent. Any organization thatdeveloped.
stores or moves important information on an electronicThe next step is the creation of a security plan, with its
network is putting its information at risk. A criminal onown procedures, budget and implementation timetable.
the other side of the world or an apparently loyalOnce those steps are complete, any new architecture
employee may have the ability to wreak havoc, bycan be rolled out and new procedures put in place. At
stealing, deleting or exposing confidential information.this point, the new system should be tested from the
The Computer Crime and Security Survey, conductedoutside for any remaining weak points.
by the Computer Security Institute and the FederalFinally, to maintain system security, security should be
Bureau of Investigation, indicates almost two-thirds ofaudited on a regular basis to keep pace with both
the large corporations and government agencies itinternal changes and evolving external threats. The
surveyed lost money when their computer securityTRA provides the map, but organizations must make
broke down.the journey. Consulting companies have identified
The survey noted that 9 out of 10 respondents hadfactors that contribute to the success or failure of an
computer security breaches during the previous 12IT security project. Senior managers have to support
months. Proprietary information worth $170.8 millionthe project and demonstrate their involvement.
was stolen from 41 respondents. Fraud cost 40Otherwise, their staffs will place a higher priority on
respondents $115.8 million.other activities.
When only 45 per cent of executives in NorthBusiness and technical experts should both be involved
America said they conduct security audits on theirbecause solutions that overburden the enterprise are
e-commerce systems, (around the world, fewer thannot acceptable. Individual business units should be
35 per cent had conducted security audits) it becomesresponsible for their own TRA to prevent
obvious that organizations must improve theirfoot-dragging during implementation and finger-pointing
defenses quickly.later. Interestingly, one consultant recommended
The first step in protecting information assets is aconducting assessments on a
Threat and Risk Assessment (TRA). Without thedepartment-by-department basis, rather than all at
information it provides, organizations are in danger ofonce. The reasoning is that valuable resources can be
fixing only what is broken and ignoring potentialnarrowly focused, and lessons learned can be carried
hazards. While the specifics of a TRA will be unique atover to subsequent assessments.
each organization, a common methodology provides aThe Threat and Risk Assessment is an important tool.
starting point.Recent reports show not enough organizations are
The first step is risk assessment, to identify the mostusing it.
important assets and information: threats and